댓글을 보면 특정 사고가 났을 때 글 쓰는 사람들이 어떤부분에 촛점을 맞추는지 알 수가 있다.
그래서 한번 그대로 옮겨와 보았다.
Why Asiana Airlines Flight 214 crash was survivable
From Richard Quest, CNN
July 7, 2013 -- Updated 0506 GMT (1306 HKT)
London (CNN) -- The attention into the crash of Asiana Airlines Flight 214 is now shifting to two areas.
One, why did the incident happen? They will be looking at things like instrument landing systems, the glide slope, the approach of the Boeing 777, the way the pilot flew the aircraft and other key aspects.
Secondly, they will be looking at the onboard training to get the passengers off as fast as they can.
Witnesses describe plane crash
Passenger: 'We just jumped off' plane
Plane loses tail during crash landing
Video from passengers after the crash landing show slides deployed and people exiting well before fire really took hold of the aircraft.
Asiana have confirmed there were 291 passengers plus 16 cabin crew onboard flight OZ214. Looking at video of the burned out wreckage and of smoke and fire soon after the crash, some may be surprised the casualty figures are so low considering there were more than 300 onboard.
Without ignoring the casualty figures from the San Francisco incident, it shows that aircraft crashes like this are proving to be survivable incidents provided there is adequate crew training and an awareness of passengers to know what to do when there is an emergency.
And those key things: Know where your exit is, know to leave your belongings behind and exit the plane quickly and orderly because that is the way planes are designed.
The B777 aircraft is built so that everybody can get off the plane within 90 seconds even if half the doors are inoperable.
And they work on that basis because as you can see in the Asiana incident, one side of the aircraft is a lot more damaged than the other -- and appears to be the main area of the fire -- so you wouldn't want to open the doors on that side.
Importantly, there is an onus on passengers -- know where the emergency exits are, don't try and take your belongings with you and take notice of and follow crew instructions and directions.
If you look at the image above you can see several passengers with bags -- one passenger with a carry-on roller case. Grabbing your carry-on luggage does not assist a speedy evacuation and observations like these will form part of a thorough safety investigation.
If there is one thing we all can take away from a tragic incident like this, it is not to ignore those important flight safety briefings at the start of each flight we take. When I fly, I always take note of where my nearest exit is, whether it is three or four or whatever rows away.
An incident like the Asiana crash should really reinforce the value of being aware of safety and emergency procedures.
Most of the planes we fly today are designed so passengers can get out within 90 seconds in an emergency. That is what we have seen in the case with this incident in San Francisco. And while flight crew training is vital, so too are the actions of passengers.
Many applauses to the flight attendants whom must have exercised extreme discipline in moving the passengers out of the plane quickly although it appears from pictures, that some passengers walked off with their luggage. In such events like this, even one passenger trying to get their luggage from the overhead bin can create a disastrous bottleneck. Imagine a stampede of people running over one another becoming trapped. I would suggest creating a safety feature whereby overhead bins will lock in the event of emergencies just the same way oxygen masks drop from the ceiling. It would take some education (warnings) to passengers not to attempt opening overhead bins in the event of an emergency deployment from the plane.
There are cases where overhead bins contain actual, life saving items. Regardless, if the bin were locked it might prevent passengers from opening the bins, but it wouldn't prevent them from trying - so it would not save time... it might actually slow down the evacuation.
You are absolutely correct. That is why I stated that it would take some educational warnings to get passengers used to the idea. Perhaps a red letter warning sign in each bin stating "In the event of an emergency, this bin will not open"
You must feel very lucky to be a plane crash survivor. I'm curious to know, did all the passengers empty the plane within 90 seconds? was there an impending fire taking place yet?
Again, there's vast discrepancies in quality and safety records throughout the region. Asiana, KAL, Malaysia, Singapore, Cathay Pacific - all sterling reputations.
Some of the regional low-cost carriers (rather sizeable ones at that) post on-time numbers below 20%. Some flag carriers are essentially on probation with the FAA and EU or even banned for their shoddy maintenance and safety.
Except in this case, as the pictures show, many/most of the passengers actually did try to take their belongings/luggage with them during the evacuation.
That is because many/most people are profoundly stupid. Block me and my family from exiting a plane that is about to burst into flames just to save your laptop and toothbrush, and you're going to get hurt.
I was on Air France 358 crash in 2005. Same thing also happened - pax took their bags. Also, lots of people climbed over seats and there is lots of pushing. But everyone got off and everyone survived.
The US pre flight safety demos mention to not take your stuff in an emergency, the Asia airlines don't do that. One other item not mentioned is these people were belted in for sure. This type of incident is where the seatbelts save people.
Self-centered asian culture trains these people that outsiders don't matter...they grow up with no thoughts of anyone but themselves and their own family...add to that the greed that has taken hold throughout asia where all the matters is your belongings (your Louis Vuitton bags or your Prada shoes) and you have the recipe for disaster. They were lucky this time the fire didn't burn more quickly...next time that lady will keep her carryon in exchange for the passenger behind her burning to death ...
definitely not true. I am Korean, and I was taught to respect others and help others. My school taught ethics. However, some Koreans(just like those of any nationalities) are greedy and self-centered. Please don't generalize.
Truth be told - I fear the OP was talking about the Han (Chinese) passengers. They took up most of the passenger manifest of OZ214. Moreover, as the PRC economy ascends, the Chinese are quickly developing one of the worst reputations in global tourism as entitled, pushy brats.
Those people need to be identified and someone HAS to make an example of them. At the absolute least, they endangered a number of people after them. Besides delaying the exit of everyone behind them, suppose their precious baggage ripped a hole in the evacuation slides? This is a serious issue.
Oh sure, the old stereotype of the boorish American lout, on package tours through Europe? I remember being among them.
For all the bad behavior I've seen travelling - bratty Europeans in North Africa, Spring Breakers in Mexico, Americans trampling through the Uffizi - some of the pushiest and entitled I've witnessed in East Asia. Old prejudices intermingle freely with newly emergent class divisions in particularly fascinating ways there.
I believe the OP may have been referring to the more recent "new rich" generation. I know most Asians from the "old school" are very honorable and respectful towards others.
Your Stereotyping here. We have seen the same behavior in American plane crashes with Americans involved, Some more serious, some less serious. Many times it is not OMG I have to grab my laptop or my bag, it shock, panic and confusion that causes people to become irrational. This is exactly why the flight crew is trained as they are. Flight attendants do NOT get the respect and admiration they deserve. They learn this drill over and over until it is automatic. When is the last time you have flown? When is the last time you watched the Flight attendants while they review the safety protocol?
I have never noticed this about Asian cultures in my travels or studies. They are no more self-centered than other people or cultures.
On a related note, I remember a time when American travelers were courteous and considerate of others. If a flight arrived late, for example, most of the passengers were willing to wait to disembark so that those with tight connections could exit first. Not anymore.
Take a chill pill man. After 12 hours of flight, these folks might not be in the right state of their mind. They just did what they thought was right at the moment.
And don't judge whole continent by the action of few folks.
Besides Aeroflot, Air France has the worst safety record - most crashes per flight-hour, most crashes per flight, most crashes per aircraft, and most fatalities per flight, flight-hour, and aircraft. Aeroflot has improved greatly in the last 20 years, whereas Air France has gotten significantly worse with six major crashes since 2000.
I would not be worried about flying Asiana, but you could not get me on an Air France flight if it was the last flight off an island that had a volcano about to explode - I'd take my chances with the volcano.
Asiana was the best service airliner that i have been on, its cheaper to i take it to korea and japan all the time. a lot of times i get upgraded to business for free
I'm sure it is no coincidence that they have been switching over to the MPL (Multicrew pilot's license) licensing where a pilot could be in right seat of a jumbo jet with fewer hours than most people get their Private Pilot certificate in the US, just to be able to take friends and family up in a small Cessna.
Mary Schiavo was on CNN talking about the possible lack of glideslope and VASI on 28L today and the fact that this landing required the same basic 'stick and rudder' skills that a "40 hour General Aviation pilot" has to use for every landing. I'll be watching to see if the FO was flying this approach. The FO on some of these asian carriers are ... quite 'green'.
Until they drop it in the panic and the people behind them trip causing everyone behind them a delay that could be the difference between life and death. There are reasons not to take out such things, the straps could get hung up, a sharp edge could deflate the emergency slide.
The quick action of the attendants and the design of the plane saved many of those people. The roof blowing off the plane allowed for the smoke to escape without passengers having to breathe it in.
